[Smtk-developers] New Feature for Attribute Definitions - inheritable association rules

Haocheng Liu haocheng.liu at kitware.com
Wed Oct 25 17:51:57 EDT 2017


On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 5:46 PM, David Thompson <david.thompson at kitware.com>
wrote:

> ...
> > Like Haocheng, I’m leaning towards the subset criteria.   ...
> > Does that make sense?
>
> It feels a little arbitrary to me, but I don't have a problem with it. The
> operator examples which come to mind can be solved by injecting a new base
> class that is the entire set of all entity types the operator supports and
> subclassing that.
>
+1. If it's a base boundary condition, it should cover all entity types and
user could tailor the derived definition to meet their needs.

>
>         David




-- 
Best regards
Haocheng

Haocheng LIU
Kitware, Inc.
R&D Engineer
21 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
Phone: 518-881-4421 <(518)%20881-4421>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/smtk-developers/attachments/20171025/b6a4fa38/attachment.html>


More information about the Smtk-developers mailing list