[Smtk-developers] Resource manager question

Haocheng Liu haocheng.liu at kitware.com
Sat Nov 4 17:52:04 EDT 2017


Hi David,

On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 2:17 PM, David Thompson <david.thompson at kitware.com>
wrote:

> Hi TJ (et al.),
>
> I have some questions about how to use the resource manager:
>
> Let's say I have a VTK reader class that loads SMTK model files (one which
> is perhaps named vtkSMTKModelReader and located in smtk/extension/paraview/server).
> Since a file is a resource, making the reader behave as expected as far as
> both VTK and SMTK will be interesting.
>
> 1. VTK expects the reader object to work if the filename changes. This
> means the same reader can read multiple resources into the resource
> manager. Should the previous resource be removed when the reader's filename
> changes? If not, there will be things in memory that aren't shown on the
> screen.
>
 I would say no...

> 2. Now let's say the file changes on disk or someone calls Modified() on
> the VTK reader... should it re-read the file? If it does, how should it go
> about this? By deleting the previous resource and calling read() again on
> the resource manager? This seems like it might work for PV-based
> applications where there's client-server separation. But in a standalone
> VTK app, it could be annoying since related GUI state like a model-tree
> view would get reset to empty before being re-populated with a default view
> in a different state than before.
>
> It should not re-read the file.
Would it makes sense that once a file is read, then the application does
not care about its state any more?
For instance, CMB loads a file called bar.smtk. Then a user changes the
filename to bar42.smtk outside CMB. CMB doesn't care until user tries to
quit CMB or save current state. In the first condition, if there is no such
file called bar.smtk then CMB should warn user. In the second condition,
CMB would not provide the overwrite option.( Sublime uses this logic and I
think it makes sense).

> 3. Finally, there doesn't appear to be a way for the resource manager to
> find resources by location. If we don't do this, it will be possible to
> have the same file loaded into the application multiple times. That might
> seem like a feature at first ("But I wanted to load it twice and render
> different things on each copy!") until someone clicks save ("Why did it
> overwrite my model with an old copy!?").
>
> I would vote against allowing user to load the same file twice or more(As
long as I recall, we used to call it a bug in discrete session :) ). If the
user needs to render different things, fine then the user should use two
seperate resources bar and foo though they are structurally identical in
SMTK world.

>         David
> _______________________________________________
> Smtk-developers mailing list
> Smtk-developers at smtk.org
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/smtk-developers
>



-- 
Best regards
Haocheng

Haocheng LIU
Kitware, Inc.
R&D Engineer
21 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
Phone: 518-881-4421 <(518)%20881-4421>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/smtk-developers/attachments/20171104/24886ee5/attachment.html>


More information about the Smtk-developers mailing list