[Smtk-developers] Attribute "paths"

[Robert Michael O'Bara]

Hi David,

You’re right - the child item does seem to violate that rule as well as Group Item Children - so go ahead and put in the new find.

Bob

Robert M. O'Bara, MEng.
Assistant Director of Scientific Computing

Kitware Inc.
28 Corporate Drive
Suite 101
Clifton Park, NY 12065

Phone: (518) 881- 4931




> On Jun 8, 2015, at 4:49 PM, David Thompson <david.thompson at kitware.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Bob,
> 
>> You can’t add an item whose name already exists in either the attribute definition OR in the definitions its derived from.
> 
> But what about children items (as opposed to inheritance)? Isn't it possible to have a child of item definition A named "foo" and a child of item definition B named "foo", with both A and B belonging to the same attribute?
> 
> 	David

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/smtk-developers/attachments/20150608/e4c056ce/attachment.html>